The ethics of health systems research theme considers the unique ethical challenges associated with long-term research engagement in low- and middle-income countries.
- What are some of the unique ethical challenges when working to reshape health systems in low-and middle-income countries?
- Does health systems research offer unique ethical dilemmas and require different approaches to ethical review?
- How do long-term research partnerships with communities and organizations effect the moral obligations of researchers and institutions?
Given the broad-ranging work of FHS in exploring areas of innovation for health systems improvement, thinking through these ethical questions is central to our efforts. It is also important to ensure that we work toward our goals of improved health access and outcomes in a manner consistent with our mission and organisational values.
The FHS Ethics Working Group is dedicated to exploring these ethical questions through engagement with partners, conceptual analysis, and empirical research.
Recent FHS publications on ethics
Pratt B and Hyder AA (2017) Governance of global health research consortia: Sharing sovereignty and resources within Future Health Systems, Social Science and Medicine, Volume 174, Pages 113–121, DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.039
Global health research partnerships are increasingly taking the form of consortia that conduct programs of research in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). An ethical framework has been developed that describes how the governance of consortia comprised of institutions from high-income countries and LMICs should be structured to promote health equity. It encompasses initial guidance for sharing sovereignty in consortia decision-making and sharing consortia resources. This paper describes a first effort to examine whether and how consortia can uphold that guidance. Case study research was undertaken with the Future Health Systems consortium, performs research to improve health service delivery for the poor in Bangladesh, China, India, and Uganda.
Pratt B, Allen K A, Hyder A A (2015) Promoting equity through health systems research in low and middle-income countries: Practices of researchers, AJOB Empirical Bioethics, doi:10.1080/23294515.2015.1122669
Health systems research is increasingly identified as an indispensable means to achieve the goal of health equity between and within countries. While conceptual work has explored what form of health systems research in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is needed to promote health equity, there have been few attempts to investigate whether it is being performed in practice. This paper describes the results of a survey undertaken with health systems researchers worldwide to assess how equity-oriented current practice is in LMICs.
The use of mHealth interventions within health systems research is increasing, with few taking into account the connections between gender and mHealth.
This policy brief attempts to fill this gap by exploring key connections between mHealth and gender that need to be taken into account when conducting or implementing mHealth research and interventions.
B. Pratt and A. A. Hyder (2015) Applying a Global Justice Lens to Health Systems Research Ethics: An Initial Exploration, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, Volume 25, Number 1, March 2015, pp. 35-66, DOI: 10.1353/ken.2015.0005
Health systems research is increasingly being performed in low and middle income countries and is essential to reducing global health disparities. This paper provides an initial description of the ethical issues related to priority setting, capacity-building, and the provision of post-study benefits that arise during the conduct of such research. It presents a selection of issues discussed in the health systems research literature and argues that they constitute ethical concerns based on their being inconsistent with a particular theory of global justice (the health capability paradigm).
Recognizing that the health system is a complex and dynamic network of actors and activities, this paper seeks to push the field of bioethics to develop a more holistic approach from the health systems perspective. Expanding upon the work of existing public health frameworks and drawing upon concepts from related areas such as governance, human rights, and organizational ethics, our provisional list of ethical considerations for health systems fall under the following categories: Holism, Sustainability, Evidence & Effectiveness, Efficiency, Public Engagement & Transparency, Accountability & Feedback, Equity & Empowerment, Justice & Fairness, Responsiveness, Collaboration, and Quality.